The story of Sardinia

Italy

Who said Zero Waste cannot work in tourist destinations? In 2000, Sardinia was Italy’s worst performing region in waste management with a separate collection rate of 3.8%. Since then the situation radically changed, thanks to the decision of setting up a Regional Programme for organic waste within its Waste Management Plan in 2004. 

The programme included four measures:

  • Compulsory separate collection of organic waste
  • Increase of the landfill tax 
  • A bonus/malus system on the cost of residual waste management based on the municipalities performances 
  • Promotion of door-to-door collection and Pay-As-You-Throw (PAYT) systems, and home composting

Today, 12 years later, Sardinia it is the best performing island in the Mediterranean and sits at the forefront of Italian and European regions with:

  • Separate collection rate reaching 60% 
  • Waste generation per capita decreased consistently: moving from 520 kg to 443 kg 
  • Residual waste went from 500 kg to 176 kg per inhabitant

 

Download the Case Study

Further questions?

Contact us if you want more information on the case study

CONTACT US

Other Best Practices

Learn from the frontrunners how a city can move towards zero waste

DISCOVER ALL

The story of Calatafimi Segesta

Italy

Calatafimi Segesta may be small, but it provides one of Europe’s leading examples of how an island municipality can implement an effective zero waste strategy whilst also focusing on improving the lives of the local community.

START

42,77%

Separate collection

NOW

85,74%

Separate collection

The story of Tübingen

Tübingen/Germany

The German city of Tübingen took the pioneering steps of introducing a city wide tax on single-use plastic items, which formed just one part of a wider strategy to foster reuse within the city.

START

Introduction of tax on some single-use items

NOW

15%

decrease of waste in public spaces

europe-logo

Supported by the LIFE Programme of the European Union. This website does not necessarily reflect the views of the donors.